Intensity assignments from historical earthquake data: issues of certainty and quality
Main Article Content
Abstract
The use of macroseismic data in assessing parameters for historical earthquakes for use in seismic hazard assessment has thrown more attention on the way in which these data are treated. The processes involved in selecting which macroseismic data from a historical earthquake survive to the present day can be modelled as
a series of filters, most of which are outside the control of the seismologist/historian, and which cause distortion
in the resulting picture of the earthquake. The ways in which the data become distorted should be taken into account when interpreting the data as intensity values. One can usefully discriminate between the certainty of an intensity assignment (how well the data fits the scale) and the quality of an intensity assignment (how well one can trust that the value is a true reflection of what really happened). The expression of uncertainty is usually in the
form of ranged intensity values; the expression of quality requires an extra symbol or rating of some sort. A
system is presented for three types of quality problems: reliability of intensity assessment, locational certainty or uncertainty, and veracity of the original data. Each of these is treated as a binary variable, giving a final quality code ranging from 0 (best) to 7 (worst). This single integer quality code preserves three types of information which can then be expanded as required by computer programs designed to handle macroseismic data.
a series of filters, most of which are outside the control of the seismologist/historian, and which cause distortion
in the resulting picture of the earthquake. The ways in which the data become distorted should be taken into account when interpreting the data as intensity values. One can usefully discriminate between the certainty of an intensity assignment (how well the data fits the scale) and the quality of an intensity assignment (how well one can trust that the value is a true reflection of what really happened). The expression of uncertainty is usually in the
form of ranged intensity values; the expression of quality requires an extra symbol or rating of some sort. A
system is presented for three types of quality problems: reliability of intensity assessment, locational certainty or uncertainty, and veracity of the original data. Each of these is treated as a binary variable, giving a final quality code ranging from 0 (best) to 7 (worst). This single integer quality code preserves three types of information which can then be expanded as required by computer programs designed to handle macroseismic data.
Article Details
How to Cite
Musson, R. M. W. (1998) “Intensity assignments from historical earthquake data: issues of certainty and quality”, Annals of Geophysics, 41(1). doi: 10.4401/ag-3795.
Issue
Section
OLD
Open-Access License
No Permission Required
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia applies the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) to all works we publish.
Under the CCAL, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, so long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.
In most cases, appropriate attribution can be provided by simply citing the original article.
If the item you plan to reuse is not part of a published article (e.g., a featured issue image), then please indicate the originator of the work, and the volume, issue, and date of the journal in which the item appeared. For any reuse or redistribution of a work, you must also make clear the license terms under which the work was published.
This broad license was developed to facilitate open access to, and free use of, original works of all types. Applying this standard license to your own work will ensure your right to make your work freely and openly available. For queries about the license, please contact ann.geophys@ingv.it.