Mitigation of seismic hazard of a megacity: the case of Naples
Main Article Content
Abstract
The seismic ground motion of a test area in the eastern district of Naples was computed with a hybrid technique
based on the rnode surnrnation and the finite difference methods. This technique allowed the realistic
modelling of source and propagation effects, including local soil conditions. In the modelling, as seismic
source we considered the 1980 Irpinia earthquake, a good example of strong shaking for the area of Naples,
located about 90 km from the source. Along a profile through Naples, trencling N86°W, the subsoil is mainly
formed by alluvial (ash, stratified sand and peat) and pyroclastic materials overlying a pyroclastic rock (yellow
Neapolitan tuff) representing the Neapolitan bedrock. The detailed information available on the subsoil mechanical
properties and its geometry warrants the application of the sophisticated hybrid technique. For SH waves,
a comparison was made between a realistic 2-D seismic response and a standard I-D response, based
on the vertical propagation of waves in a plane layered structure. As expected the sedimentary cover caused an
increase in the signal's amplitudes and duration. If a thin uniform peat layer is present, the amplification effects
are reduced, and the peak ground accelerations are similar to those observed for the bedrock model. This
can be explained by the backscattering of wave energy at such a laqer. The discrepancies evidenced between
the l -D and the 2-D seismic response suggest that serious caution must be taken in the formulation of seismic
regulations. This is particularly true in the presence of the thin peat laqer where the misinatch between the l -D
and the 2-D amplification functions is particularly evident in correspondence of the dominant peak and of the
second significant peak.
based on the rnode surnrnation and the finite difference methods. This technique allowed the realistic
modelling of source and propagation effects, including local soil conditions. In the modelling, as seismic
source we considered the 1980 Irpinia earthquake, a good example of strong shaking for the area of Naples,
located about 90 km from the source. Along a profile through Naples, trencling N86°W, the subsoil is mainly
formed by alluvial (ash, stratified sand and peat) and pyroclastic materials overlying a pyroclastic rock (yellow
Neapolitan tuff) representing the Neapolitan bedrock. The detailed information available on the subsoil mechanical
properties and its geometry warrants the application of the sophisticated hybrid technique. For SH waves,
a comparison was made between a realistic 2-D seismic response and a standard I-D response, based
on the vertical propagation of waves in a plane layered structure. As expected the sedimentary cover caused an
increase in the signal's amplitudes and duration. If a thin uniform peat layer is present, the amplification effects
are reduced, and the peak ground accelerations are similar to those observed for the bedrock model. This
can be explained by the backscattering of wave energy at such a laqer. The discrepancies evidenced between
the l -D and the 2-D seismic response suggest that serious caution must be taken in the formulation of seismic
regulations. This is particularly true in the presence of the thin peat laqer where the misinatch between the l -D
and the 2-D amplification functions is particularly evident in correspondence of the dominant peak and of the
second significant peak.
Article Details
How to Cite
1.
Nunziata C, Fah D, Panza GF. Mitigation of seismic hazard of a megacity: the case of Naples. Ann. Geophys. [Internet]. 1995Nov.25 [cited 2023Dec.8];38(5-6). Available from: https://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/4055
Issue
Section
OLD
Open-Access License
No Permission Required
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia applies the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) to all works we publish.
Under the CCAL, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, so long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.
In most cases, appropriate attribution can be provided by simply citing the original article.
If the item you plan to reuse is not part of a published article (e.g., a featured issue image), then please indicate the originator of the work, and the volume, issue, and date of the journal in which the item appeared. For any reuse or redistribution of a work, you must also make clear the license terms under which the work was published.
This broad license was developed to facilitate open access to, and free use of, original works of all types. Applying this standard license to your own work will ensure your right to make your work freely and openly available. For queries about the license, please contact ann.geophys@ingv.it.