Capable fault assessment in Seismic Microzonation of volcanic environments: fault behaviour classes and zone‑based mapping from the Mt. Etna (Italy) case study

Main Article Content

Edoardo Peronace
Raffaele Azzaro
Anna Maria Blumetti
Stefano Catalano
Valerio Comerci
Roberto de Franco
Pio Di Manna
Paolo Galli
Marco Mancini
Attilio Porchia
Antonio Torrisi
Giuseppe Tortorici
and ETNA ACF Working Group:
Jessica Bellanova
Graziano Boniolo
Giulio Brunelli
Grazia Caielli
Giuseppe Calamita
Roberto Carluccio
Giuseppe Cavuoto
Giuseppe Cosentino
Francesca D'Ajello Caracciolo
Salvatore D'Amico
Federica Davani
Gregory De Martino
Vincenzo Di Fiore
Daniela Famiani
Iolanda Gaudiosi
Sabrina Grassi
Francesco Guglielmino
Salomon Hailemikael
Sebastiano Imposa
Vincenzo Lapenna
Valerio Materni
Giuliano Milana
Gabriele Morreale
Daniela Niceforo
Iacopo Nicolosi
Mario Paratore
Nicola Pelosi
Angela Perrone
Claudia Pirrotta
Sabatino Piscitelli
Michele Punzo
Luca Maria Puzzilli
Valerio Ruscito
Vincenzo Sapia
Maurizio Simionato
Daniela Tarallo
Giuseppina Tusa

Abstract

The volcanic region of Mt. Etna (Sicily, Italy) presents a unique challenge for seismic hazard assessment due to the interplay between regional tectonics, flank instability, magmatic processes and shallow volcano‑tectonic dynamics. The area is frequently affected by shallow (H < 5 km), moderate‑magnitude earthquakes (Mmax ≈5.0) that generate extensive surface faulting, often disproportionate to their energy release. Standard national regulations for “Active and Capable Faults” (ACF), originally designed for tectonic environments, fail to address specific volcanic features such as “hidden” faults, aseismic creep, and diffuse fracturing fields. This paper presents the newly developed “Guidelines for the study of Active and Capable Faults in the Etna volcanic area” (GL_ACF_Etna, Version 2.1). We introduce a tailored classification system that distinguishes
between Exposed and Buried ACFs, creeping faults and Active Fracturing Zones (AFZ). Furthermore, we define criteria for delimiting Respect Zones (RZ) and Susceptibility Zones (SZ) for Level 3 Seismic Microzonation (SM3). The proposed methodology integrates historical macroseismic data, high‑resolution geological mapping, geophysical investigation and multi‑temporal InSAR analysis to provide a robust tool for land‑use planning in one of Europe’s most active volcanic areas.

Article Details

Section

SPECIAL ISSUE: Integrated Approaches to Seismic Microzonation in Volcanic Areas

How to Cite

(1)
Peronace, E.; Azzaro, R.; Blumetti, A. M.; Catalano, S.; Comerci, V.; de Franco, R.; Di Manna, P.; Galli, P.; Mancini, M.; Porchia, A.; Torrisi, A.; Tortorici, G.; and ETNA ACF Working Group:; Bellanova, J.; Boniolo, G.; Brunelli, G.; Caielli, G.; Calamita, G.; Carluccio, R.; Cavuoto, G.; Cosentino, G.; D'Ajello Caracciolo, F.; D'Amico, S.; Davani, F.; De Martino, G.; Di Fiore, V.; Famiani, D.; Gaudiosi, I.; Grassi, S.; Guglielmino, F.; Hailemikael, S.; Imposa, S.; Lapenna, V.; Materni, V.; Milana, G.; Morreale, G.; Niceforo, D.; Nicolosi, I.; Paratore, M.; Pelosi, N.; Perrone, A.; Pirrotta, C.; Piscitelli, S.; Punzo, M.; Puzzilli, L. M.; Ruscito, V.; Sapia, V.; Simionato, M.; Tarallo, D.; Tusa, G. Capable Fault Assessment in Seismic Microzonation of Volcanic Environments: Fault Behaviour Classes and Zone‑based Mapping from the Mt. Etna (Italy) Case Study. Ann. Geophys. 2026, 69. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-9623.

References