Ionospheric topside models compared with experimental electron density profiles
Main Article Content
Abstract
Recently an increasing number of topside electron density profiles has been made available to the scientific community
on the Internet. These data are important for ionospheric modeling purposes, since the experimental information
on the electron density above the ionosphere maximum of ionization is very scarce. The present work
compares NeQuick and IRI models with the topside electron density profiles available in the databases of the
ISIS2, IK19 and Cosmos 1809 satellites. Experimental electron content from the F2 peak up to satellite height
and electron densities at fixed heights above the peak have been compared under a wide range of different conditions.
The analysis performed points out the behavior of the models and the improvements needed to be assessed
to have a better reproduction of the experimental results. NeQuick topside is a modified Epstein layer,
with thickness parameter determined by an empirical relation. It appears that its performance is strongly affected
by this parameter, indicating the need for improvements of its formulation. IRI topside is based on Booker's
approach to consider two parts with constant height gradients. It appears that this formulation leads to an overestimation
of the electron density in the upper part of the profiles, and overestimation of TEC.
on the Internet. These data are important for ionospheric modeling purposes, since the experimental information
on the electron density above the ionosphere maximum of ionization is very scarce. The present work
compares NeQuick and IRI models with the topside electron density profiles available in the databases of the
ISIS2, IK19 and Cosmos 1809 satellites. Experimental electron content from the F2 peak up to satellite height
and electron densities at fixed heights above the peak have been compared under a wide range of different conditions.
The analysis performed points out the behavior of the models and the improvements needed to be assessed
to have a better reproduction of the experimental results. NeQuick topside is a modified Epstein layer,
with thickness parameter determined by an empirical relation. It appears that its performance is strongly affected
by this parameter, indicating the need for improvements of its formulation. IRI topside is based on Booker's
approach to consider two parts with constant height gradients. It appears that this formulation leads to an overestimation
of the electron density in the upper part of the profiles, and overestimation of TEC.
Article Details
How to Cite
Coïsson, P. and Radicella, S. M. (2005) “Ionospheric topside models compared with experimental electron density profiles”, Annals of Geophysics, 48(3). doi: 10.4401/ag-3214.
Issue
Section
OLD
Open-Access License
No Permission Required
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia applies the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) to all works we publish.
Under the CCAL, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, so long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.
In most cases, appropriate attribution can be provided by simply citing the original article.
If the item you plan to reuse is not part of a published article (e.g., a featured issue image), then please indicate the originator of the work, and the volume, issue, and date of the journal in which the item appeared. For any reuse or redistribution of a work, you must also make clear the license terms under which the work was published.
This broad license was developed to facilitate open access to, and free use of, original works of all types. Applying this standard license to your own work will ensure your right to make your work freely and openly available. For queries about the license, please contact ann.geophys@ingv.it.